Home / DMAIC / Measure

Measure · Tool guide 11 of 40

Measurement System Analysis Type II

In this guide, Type II means a multi-part, multi-operator Gage R&R study for continuous measurements. It estimates repeatability and reproducibility, including operator-by-part interaction where the design permits. The Type II label is not universal; state the actual study design.

Expected output: A documented continuous Gage R&R study with components, metric definitions and decisions.

01 · Purpose

Why and when to use it

Use it when different people measure a range of items and measurement variation could affect decisions.

Who takes part?

The measurement owner works with people who understand the process and the recorded data. Statistical or measurement-system decisions should involve someone able to check the assumptions and study design.

02 · Application

How to apply it

Start with an agreed measurement purpose, explicit units and trustworthy observations. Identify missing cases and assumptions before calculating.

  1. Select parts spanning the relevant operating variation.
  2. Choose representative operators and independent repeat measurements.
  3. Randomise order and blind prior readings in a crossed study where each operator can measure each part.
  4. Use a suitable variance-components analysis; inspect operator-by-part interaction.
  5. Report measurement variation with its denominator and improve the system where needed.

03 · Example

A worked measurement example

Original fictional teaching example. Small datasets illustrate the method; they are not proposed as sufficient study sizes. Supplied parameters are assumptions, not estimates from a real process.

Variance componentIllustrative value (g²)
Repeatability0.04
Operator-related reproducibility, combined0.05
Total Gage R&R0.04 + 0.05 = 0.09; SD = 0.30 g
Part-to-part0.91
Total observed variance1.00; % variance contribution from R&R = 9%; % study variation = 30%
Variance contributions to total variance 1.00 g²Repeatability: 4%Operator-related: 5%Part-to-part: 91%
R&R contributes 9% of variance; its SD-based study variation is 30%, not 9%.

04 · Interpretation

What the result tells you

Nine percent of variance and thirty percent of standard-deviation-based study variation describe the same example with different denominators. Label the metric explicitly. The supplied component values are illustrative, not fitted from a dataset here.

Completion check: A documented continuous Gage R&R study with components, metric definitions and decisions.

05 · Judgement

Mistakes and limitations

A crossed design is unsuitable if measuring destroys the part; consider a justified nested or destructive-test design. Study parts must not be chosen merely to inflate process spread and make the gage look better.

07 · Reading

Sources and further reading

The tool list follows the accepted LeanTrainingLab overview and its reference to Six Sigma+Lean Toolset, second edition (Lunau, editor; Springer, 2013). The book chapters were not available for direct review during this build. Explanations, examples and worksheets are original teaching material. Further reading supplies professional background; local conventions are stated explicitly.